<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the Future of Citizen Media #gv2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://karim.co.za/blog/2010/05/19/thoughts-on-the-future-of-citizen-media-gv2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://karim.co.za/blog/2010/05/19/thoughts-on-the-future-of-citizen-media-gv2010/</link>
	<description>A Double Espresso in a Decaf World...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad</title>
		<link>http://karim.co.za/blog/2010/05/19/thoughts-on-the-future-of-citizen-media-gv2010/comment-page-1/#comment-57839</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 16:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karim.co.za/blog/?p=610#comment-57839</guid>
		<description>I agree with that point in the context of general social media. But let me clarify citizen media... I mean it in the context specifically of an organisation like Global Voices, who sift through the chaff to get the real stories on the ground and present a zeitgeist picture. 

General news agencies, etc. Will also practice the same journalistic integrity when looking for content in the social media arena.

The people who do speak sense stand out anyway. I believe it will become easier especially since the entire environment of social media promotes those who are more relevant i.e. More links, more readers, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with that point in the context of general social media. But let me clarify citizen media&#8230; I mean it in the context specifically of an organisation like Global Voices, who sift through the chaff to get the real stories on the ground and present a zeitgeist picture. </p>
<p>General news agencies, etc. Will also practice the same journalistic integrity when looking for content in the social media arena.</p>
<p>The people who do speak sense stand out anyway. I believe it will become easier especially since the entire environment of social media promotes those who are more relevant i.e. More links, more readers, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mash</title>
		<link>http://karim.co.za/blog/2010/05/19/thoughts-on-the-future-of-citizen-media-gv2010/comment-page-1/#comment-57753</link>
		<dc:creator>mash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 11:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karim.co.za/blog/?p=610#comment-57753</guid>
		<description>I sort of disagree. I think it will just mean a lot of white noise.

Yes there will be much more freedom for anyone to write or produce something and also for organisation to get there message out, but at the same time it will be easier for a user to block that content or to filter it out.

For example if there is a website that is made of lots of stories and media from normal citizens - if I never go on it. I will never see it

Also what traditional journalism has over &#039;citizen journalism&#039; is proven quality. That&#039;s why I log onto the Guardian every day.... how is a &#039;amateurs&#039; website going to provide consistent quality?

If we assume that a citizen journalist is someone for whom it&#039;s not a dayjob.. I would then assume that any decent talent out there will be quickly hoovered up by the mainstream and then become a part of the establishment.

to be honest I think a lot of this stuff is just a fad.Edit12:40</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sort of disagree. I think it will just mean a lot of white noise.</p>
<p>Yes there will be much more freedom for anyone to write or produce something and also for organisation to get there message out, but at the same time it will be easier for a user to block that content or to filter it out.</p>
<p>For example if there is a website that is made of lots of stories and media from normal citizens &#8211; if I never go on it. I will never see it</p>
<p>Also what traditional journalism has over &#8216;citizen journalism&#8217; is proven quality. That&#8217;s why I log onto the Guardian every day&#8230;. how is a &#8216;amateurs&#8217; website going to provide consistent quality?</p>
<p>If we assume that a citizen journalist is someone for whom it&#8217;s not a dayjob.. I would then assume that any decent talent out there will be quickly hoovered up by the mainstream and then become a part of the establishment.</p>
<p>to be honest I think a lot of this stuff is just a fad.Edit12:40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Thoughts on the Future of Citizen Media #gv2010 &#124; Waiting in Transit... -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://karim.co.za/blog/2010/05/19/thoughts-on-the-future-of-citizen-media-gv2010/comment-page-1/#comment-57685</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Thoughts on the Future of Citizen Media #gv2010 &#124; Waiting in Transit... -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://karim.co.za/blog/?p=610#comment-57685</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Muhammad Karim. Muhammad Karim said: Thoughts on the Future of Citizen Media #gv2010 http://bit.ly/ahljVX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Muhammad Karim. Muhammad Karim said: Thoughts on the Future of Citizen Media #gv2010 <a href="http://bit.ly/ahljVX" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ahljVX</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

